Aceh

Aceh was a disaster on 26th December, 2004.

It was wildly successful. Too successful.

The use of natural disasters as a tool to enable the acquisition of oil and mineral rich areas has been highlighted by the dreadful deaths of 300,000 people.

A submarine was damaged. That had to be explained away as a navigation failure. Another set of casualties.

What happened? The plan was simple. But the planners had neglected the trenches in the area that connected northwards for nearly 1000kms. The trenches are unusual as they have been filling for thousands of years with decaying animals and vegetation, marine and swept off the land masses nearby. As trenches, they accumulated massive amounts and lost little to the surrounding seabed. In time they became frozen, highly pressurized masses of clathrates, jumbles of organic chemicals particularly rich in methane. Methane is an explosive gas, but as a solid, it expanded 30 times it's size in one dimension. It possesses three dimensions so became gaseous plasma, 27,000 times the original size. This vast explosion should have been detectable. The actual detonation device was detected as 6.0 on the successor to the
richter scale. Due to the colossal size of the disturbance, monitored by the US armed forces, thius had to be revised upwards, nonsensically, to 9.3, 3,000 times the intended explosion.

Months later, Air Force officers are disciplined. Were they the planners? Does it matter? Publish this freely!

Peter Garret

He was a rock star. He is a minister in the Rudd government. He decided that a dam should not be built. Despite the strong support for that dam of a dubious labour government in Queensland.


That has annoyed a few very wealthy people who wanted to become wealthier. So he has been demoted for his responsibility in respect of a rushed stimulus scheme which has enabled untrained twits to staple live electrical wiring.

Location, loacation, location

It is shattering.

You realize that all the neighbours are stupid or greedy or both and are intent on destroying their economy by trading in flower bulbs, shares in a dubious scheme in the South Pacific or selling houses to one another at a fifty per cent profit each time they sell. In all three cases they have been able to borrow money that they clearly cannot repay if they lose their job or if the property market crashes.

You wish to escape from this mess. You decide to sell your main asset one which everyone around says will keep on going up in value. You tell your neighbours you are not upgrading or buying a few houses. They laugh at you.

Where are you going to live now you have far more money than the house was ever worth as a habitation?

Avoid earthquahe zones.

To be continued

Swiss Have Low Crime Rate

http://www.kickthemallout.com/article.php/Story-Why_Swiss_Have_Lowest_Crime_Rate

Carbon dating Anomalies!

http://www.varchive.org/ce/c14.htm

Fossil fuels may not represent fossils and in any case, their age is unknown. Coal certainly can come from plant material, but it may not need hundreds of millions of years to form.

Protonic matter may and does eventually, decay to neutrons. Thus N14 becomes C14. The process may be accomplished by electromagnetism which may be sourced by lightning strikes or other means. Not everything in the history we call the bible is a fantasy, and not every interpretation is true. Calling a book Genesis may be a lie! It may merely describe events seen by humans. The question then becomes, what events and when?

Cliches, slogans whatever!

Cliches are small highly condensed aphorisms that afford a pictorial within far fewer than a thousand words.

Someone read this and let me know whether I should read it or not?

http://earthchangesmedia.com/ufo/0209gandor.htm